Employment: Automated Decision Systems (SB 947, ‘No Robo Bosses Act’)
Bars California employers from relying solely on automated decision systems for discipline or termination decisions, requires human review and corroboration, requires a written post-use notice to affected employees and, on request, a description of the employee’s data the system used. Protects workers from retaliation for asserting these rights.
Why it matters
Employers and HR-tech vendors must build human review and worker notices into any AI-assisted discipline or firing process by mid-2027.
What it requires
Key obligations, provision by provision
5 obligations in article order. How IDs work
Do not use an automated decision system to violate labour, safety, employment or civil rights laws, to infer an employee’s protected status, or to predict and punish workers for exercising legal rights.
Do not rely solely on an automated decision system for discipline or termination; when relying primarily on its output, have a human corroborate it, and do not use output that cannot be corroborated or is inaccurate.
Give an employee disciplined or terminated primarily using an automated decision system, on request, a meaningful, objective description of their own data the system used, anonymising other people’s personal information.
Give an employee, when informing them of discipline or termination primarily based on an automated decision system, a plain-language stand-alone written notice stating this, that a human corroborated it, a contact person, and non-retaliation rights.
Do not discharge, threaten, demote, suspend or otherwise retaliate against an employee for using rights under the part, complaining to the Labor Commissioner, or helping enforce it.
Penalties
$500 civil penalty per violation; Labor Commissioner and public prosecutors enforce
Cite this record
WTA-R-US-CA-0008: Employment: Automated Decision Systems (SB 947, ‘No Robo Bosses Act’). California Legislature / Governor. wheresthe.ai, https://wheresthe.ai/rule/us-ca-sb947-no-robo-bosses-2026/ (checked 4 Oct 2026).
History
- Summary changed from …and requires notice to affected workers including a description of the data… to …requires a written post-use notice to affected employees and, on request, a description of the employee’s data the system…
More from California
-
In forceEffective 1 Jan 2026
-
In forceEffective 1 Jan 2026
-
Partly in forceEffective 1 Jan 2026
-
In forceEffective 1 Jan 2026
-
Enacted, not yet in forceApplies 1 Jan 2027
-
Partly in forceEffective 2 Aug 2026