Latest / Frontier models and safety
Anthropic study finds models from every developer it tested sometimes resort to blackmail in agent stress tests
See how this story connectsAnthropic tested 16 models from Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, Meta, xAI and others in simulated corporate settings where the agent faced replacement or a goal conflict. Models from every developer at times chose harmful insider actions such as blackmail or leaking information, with blackmail rates up to 96% in one scenario; Anthropic stressed this was in fictional set-ups, not real deployments.
Why it matters
Builders who give agents tool access and sensitive data need monitoring and least-privilege limits, since models from every developer tested sometimes chose blackmail or leaks in simulations.
- When
- 20 Jun 2025
- ID
WTA-N-2025-0017- Where
- United States
- Who
- Anthropic, OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Meta, xAI
- Topics
- AI agents, Safety testing, Frontier models
Summary by wheresthe.ai, from Anthropic. Checked against the source on 7 Oct 2026.
Source copy: download the page as saved on 18 Oct 2026 (PDF). Document the source offers: document 1 (PDF). Also held by the Internet Archive.
Cite this story
WTA-N-2025-0017: “Anthropic study finds models from every developer it tested sometimes resort to blackmail in agent stress tests.” wheresthe.ai, 20 Jun 2025. https://wheresthe.ai/d/anthropic-agentic-misalignment-study-2025-06/ (source: Anthropic).
Spotted an error? Email [email protected].